For many parents, the most pressing fear of child custody negotiations is the concern that the other parent will try to keep their children from them. This fear can actually prevent the parents from remaining focused on what is best for the children as they try to battle each other.
Buffalo Grove Custody Establishment Or Modification Lawyer
At Buffalo Grove Law Offices, we are committed to keeping the process directed at an outcome that is in the best interest of the children. We will reach a resolution as efficiently and inexpensively as possible, minimizing the drain on the family.
Mandatory Mediation Is The First Step
Unless both parents come to agreement regarding custody, the issue of custody must go through mediation before you can go to court on the issue of custody. The only exception to that is when a temporary custody decision must be made. This will allow both parents to come together in a facilitated discussion, both helping to decide how the children will be looked after and provided for following the divorce or in other cases not involving divorcing couples.
We will explain this process to you, providing the information and understanding that you need to approach mediation in a productive and informed manner. The custody process will include evaluations and interviews.
Most cases are settled before court, but if needed, we are prepared to represent your interests before the family law judge. The outcome of this decision and the amount of time you are granted with your children is vitally important, and we are committed to fighting for you and for the best interests of your children.
We will also help to negotiate joint custody and visitation agreements that best serve your family and allow adequate parenting time with both the mother and father, regardless of who was granted custodial or non-custodial rights.
Modification Of Custody Orders
No motion to modify a custody judgment may be made earlier than two years after its date, unless the court permits an earlier date because there is reason to believe the child’s present environment may endanger seriously his or her physical, mental, moral, or emotional health. However, after two years, the standard for the court to use is ‘the best interest of the child. This standard is the one that is also used in making the original custody order.
FORMER BOYFRIEND HAD NO STANDING TO BRING CLAIM FOR CUSTODY
The former boyfriend did not have statutory standing to bring a claim for custody of a minor adopted from Slovakia by his former girlfriend. The parties had never married, and they had taken no steps for the adoption to be recognized in Illinois. The father had not adopted the child, who remained in the custody of the adoptive mother. Illinois does not recognize the common-law standing of a nonparent to bring a petition for custody of a minor. In re Parentage of Scarlett Z.D., 2012 Il App (2d) 120266 (Aug 30, 2012) DuPage Co.
Contact An Arlington Heights Child Custody Lawyer
To arrange an initial consultation to discuss your situation and the options available to you, please contact our Illinois law firm today at (847) 772-8579.
Husband had stock gifted to him. By his father during the marriage. Husband sold the stock after the marriage. He sold it at a loss. Wife argued that his child support payments should be higher based on the sale of stock. The trial court said that the cash proceeds simply took the place of the…
Read MoreParties divorced and divided husband’s pension between them. The parties had three children. Husband was ordered to pay child support to wife.Husband later retired. He filed a motion to reduce his child support payment. Upon retirement, he received a monthly amount from his pension.Husband argued that the pension division was included in the property settlement.…
Read MoreThe parties lived in Illinois. They moved to Canada. The parties and their children traveled from Ontario to Lake Forest, Illinois. They had purchased tickets for all of them to return to Canada. However, while in Lake County, Wife told Husband that she and the two children would not return to Canada. She filed for…
Read MoreMother was awarded custody of the child in the divorce judgment. Three years later, father filed a motion to modify custody. He alleged it was in child’s best interest to be placed in his custody. The court denied his motion. He filed a Motion to Reconsider. He argued that the trial court applied an incorrect…
Read MoreMother filed a petition to restrict the visitation of the father. She alleged disrupting conduct by the father in the presence of the children. The trial court determined that Father’s behavior was ‘not only disturbing but egregious. It warrants a modification of the Joint Parenting Agreement.’ Also, his behavior was “a substantial endangerment” to the…
Read More