Child Support

In most divorce proceedings, both parents care deeply for the children and want to make decisions that are in the kids’ best interests. At the same time, however, there is always a fear that the other parent will extort this emotion and force you to pay more for the children than is fair.

It is always best for the children if both parents contribute equitably. At Buffalo Grove Law Offices, our Arlington Heights child support lawyer protects the interests of parents, working for child support agreements that are fair to both parents and in the best interests of the children.

How The Court Determines Support Amounts

The court may order either or both parents owing a duty of support to a child of the marriage to pay an amount reasonable and necessary for his or her support, without regard to marital misconduct. The duty of support owed to a child includes the obligation to provide for the reasonable and necessary physical, mental and emotional health needs of the child. For purposes of determining child support here, the term “child” shall include any child under age 18 and any child under age 19 who is still attending high school.

There are guidelines set forth by the state of Illinois when it comes to paying child support. In general, the court will order a certain percentage of the supporting party’s net income that should go toward payments. However, the court may deviate from these percentages in an effort to reflect the best interests of the child. We can help protect your interests when it comes to support determinations while always keeping the well-being of your child in mind.

CHILD SUPPORT BELOW THE GUIDELINES

The judgment ordered a downward deviation of child support from $1,433 per month to $1,000 in In re Marriage of Berberet, 2012 Il App (4th) 110749. The court found that, if guideline support were applied, the mother’s net income would exceed the father’s by nearly $4,000. She would have a net monthly income of $7,035, and he would have a net monthly income of $3,046. The trial court found that the father would experience extreme financial constraint if he were required to pay the guidelines and that his ability to participate in social, curricular, extracurricular or any recreational activities with the children would be severely affected, which was not in the best interest of the children. The appellate court upheld the deviation ruling that the trial court followed all of the appropriate statutory guidelines for deviating downward.

Please visit the Spousal Maintenance page of this website to read the article, “The Office of Child Support Enforcement does not collect spousal support unless a child support obligation is also being processed.”

Please visit the Family Law Articles page of this website to read the article, “Dead Beat Dad Enters a General Appearance.”

Please visit the Family Law Articles page of this website to read the article, “The Enforcement of Child Support Provisions in Foreign Divorce Decrees.”

Please visit the Family Law Articles page of this website to read the article, “Sperm Donor Can Keep it in His Pocket.”

Contact A Buffalo Grove Support Modification Lawyer

If you are initially setting up a support agreement, or if you feel a modification to an existing agreement is in order, speak with our attorney. Contact us online or call (847) 772-8579 to schedule an appointment to discuss your situation.

DON’T SIT ON YOUR RIGHTS, DAD

By Buffalo Grove Law Offices | July 21, 2021 | Comments Off on DON’T SIT ON YOUR RIGHTS, DAD

Husband filed for divorce.   He presented DNA test results that he was not the biological father of the child.  Both husband and wife knew the minor child was not biologically his.  The child had been diagnosed with a particular genetic disease at birth.   The parties agreed to stay together as a family.  They remained married…

Read More

DON’T SIT ON YOUR RIGHTS, MOM

By Buffalo Grove Law Offices | July 21, 2021 | Comments Off on DON’T SIT ON YOUR RIGHTS, MOM

Parties divorce. Husband owes child support. Ex-husband dies.  The ex-wife filed a claim for back child support four years later. She filed in probate court against the ex-husband’s estate. She argued that there was an existing lien against the assets in the ex-husband’s estate according to the law.  The total amount she sought was $65,976…

Read More

ACTIONS SPEAK LOUDER THAN YOU KNOW

By Buffalo Grove Law Offices | July 21, 2021 | Comments Off on ACTIONS SPEAK LOUDER THAN YOU KNOW

Wife filed a post judgment petition to modify support. Husband was ordered to pay back child support in the amount of $337,478.   And, the wife’s attorneys’ fees in the amount of $49,025. The trial court also modified the monthly support amount from $4,250 per month to $19,284 per month. Husband filed an appeal against the…

Read More

CHILD SUPPORT INCLUDES SOCIAL SECURITY BENEFITS

By Buffalo Grove Law Offices | July 21, 2021 | Comments Off on CHILD SUPPORT INCLUDES SOCIAL SECURITY BENEFITS

The parties divorced. Father was ordered to pay monthly support per guidelines.  There were three children, so the guideline amount was 32% of Father’s net income. Mother was also given the children’s portion of Father’s social security payments.  Father argued that the social security benefit for the children should be deducted from the guideline child…

Read More

CAN YOU STOP SUPPORTING YOUR CHILD BECAUSE YOU DON’T GET ALONG?

By Buffalo Grove Law Offices | July 21, 2021 | Comments Off on CAN YOU STOP SUPPORTING YOUR CHILD BECAUSE YOU DON’T GET ALONG?

The mother filed a petition for a father to contribute to their son’s college expenses. The petition alleged that son had graduated from Marmion Academy in Aurora with a 3.75-grade point average. He would be enrolling at Purdue University in the fall. The cost of attending Purdue University was approximately $20,000 per year. Son would…

Read More

A CHILD SUPPORT DUTY AND CONSIDERING A NEW SPOUSE’S INCOME

By Buffalo Grove Law Offices | July 21, 2021 | Comments Off on A CHILD SUPPORT DUTY AND CONSIDERING A NEW SPOUSE’S INCOME

The wife filed a petition to modify child support. The court considered the joint income of the husband and his current wife in assessing child support. Husband wanted the court to only look at his income. The Trial Court did consider the current wife’s income, along with the husband’s. Husband appealed. The Appellate Court agreed…

Read More